Thursday, March 26, 2015

Hermann J. Muller

X-rays are a viable part of medicine today and have been used in clinical medicine and for experimental purposes in physics since their discovery in 1895. The value of X-rays to genetics research only became apparent however when Hermann Muller used radioactivity to produce point mutations in the fruit fly Drosophila. Muller was an American geneticist known for his demonstration that mutations and hereditary changes can be caused by X-rays affecting genes and chromosomes. His work on the mutating abilities of X-rays won him the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1946.


Hermann Joseph Muller was born December 21st, 1890 in New York and died April 5, 1967. He grew up in Manhattan and after graduating high school in 1907 at the age of sixteen, Muller attended Columbia University and was attracted to the emerging field of genetics. He was interested specifically in the physical and chemical nature and operations of genes. Muller also continued his graduate education at Columbia and spent time in T.H. Morgan’s infamous Drosophila lab. Muller along with other students in the lab, took part in stealing milk bottles from apartment steps in order to house the fruit flies.

During his time in the Fly Lab, Muller published a paper demonstrating the effects of mutations in one gene on the expression of other genes, implying that many fly characteristics depended on the interaction of several genes. However, Muller clashed with Morgan and his other students, particularly Alfred Sturtevant, feeling that he was not fully acknowledged and that his ideas weren’t fully represented in the papers.  Due to his quarrels with members of the lab, Muller left in 1915 after obtaining his degree. 

Muller continued his studies involving the molecular, physical, and chemical natures and operations of genes and their resulting effects on gene expression to demonstrate during the 1920s that X-rays could induce mutations. This discovery won him fame and then later contributed to his winning of the Nobel Prize.

In 1926 at the University of Texas, Muller exposed male fruit flies to high doses of radiation to then let them mate with virgin female fruit flies. Muller was able to artificially induce more than 100 mutations in the offspring. Some of the mutations were deadly others were not lethal but visible in the offspring. Muller concluded that radioactivity had the ability to reach chromosomes to affect the molecular structure of individual genes leaving them either inoperative or altering their chemical functions.

Muller’s paper “Artificial Transmutation of the Gene” published in 1927 provided only an outline of the data but he presented at the International Congress of Plant Sciences to create a media sensation. He used his fame from his discovery to caution against the indiscriminate use of X-rays in medicine. Despite his adamant warnings, some physicians continued using high amounts of X-rays and some even continued to prescribe X-rays to stimulate ovulation in sterile women.

Muller also was known for his strong and often outspoken views on socialism, which got him in trouble with the administration while working at the University of Texas. He collaborated on a Communist newspaper at the University resulting in the FBI tracking his activities. Muller decided to leave for Europe in 1932 during the Depression and moved to the Soviet Union in 1934.  

Initially Muller was happy with the progressive Communist society in the Soviet Union, however he quickly grew unhappy as Stalin’s police state attacked genetics by pushing the Lamarckian ideas of evolution. The state dictated who could work in his lab and interrogated him for referring to the work of Germans or Russian emigres. Muller eventually left the Soviet Union in 1937 and spent eight weeks in Spain helping the International Brigade develop a method of obtaining blood from recently killed soldiers to use for transfusions. He then moved again, this time to Scotland and worked at the University of Edinburgh continuing with X-rays and other mutagens like UV and mustard gas.

In 1940, Muller fled Scotland due World War II to find a permanent position at Indiana University in 1945. A year later in 1946, Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on mutation-inducing X-rays. He seized this opportunity to continue pressing for more public knowledge about the hazards of X-ray radiation. Hermann Muller increased his stature to speak out after the dropping of atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945.

Throughout his career, Muller advocated for the education of the public by scientists. He felt that it was the responsibility of scientists to educate the public on their research or on pertinent topics. Muller fought against the Texas school board’s attack on evolution. Hermann Muller often was faced with strict criticism for beliefs, yet he advocated for scientists to speak out on topics and to not be afraid to use their voices.

 He did promote the view of eugenics, but he criticized the American eugenics movement for its racism and classism. He recommended voluntary reproduction through artificial insemination for families with genetic disorders. He supported “positive” eugenics such as the use of reproductive technologies such as sperm banks and artificial insemination but wrote that “ Any attempt to accomplish genetic improvement through dictation must be debasing and self-defeating”.

Hermann J. Muller died on April 5, 1967 due to congestive heart failure.

I find Muller’s call for scientists to educate others on their findings to be valuable and vital for the discoveries of scientists to fully reach their significance and potential. It isn’t until the knowledge is understood by others, especially the general public, that we can say that the finding has reached its true value. It allows people to act on the knowledge for positive change. This can be carried beyond merely informing the public to involving them as seen in the ideas of Citizen Science that were discussed a few weeks ago by Dr. Haynes. Involving those influenced by the issues provides a more direct source to the problems, resulting in ideas and opinions for solutions from those actually experiencing the problem.


 Muller additionally told his students to bear witness to and to speak out against the abuses of science in their generation. He argued that genetics was the most subversive science due its basis being fundamental to human nature and for that we must take the most ethical and respectful approach. Muller’s continual and adamant advocacy against the dangerous effects of X-rays is admirable and crucial to our current precautions surroundings use of radiation. Muller’s insight into genes as individual molecular units was influential and spurred the development of molecular biology and for that, his legacy continues today.



Works Cited
Carlson, Elof. "Hermann Joseph Muller." Hermann Joseph Muller 1890—1967 (2009): n. pag. National Academy of Science Online. National Acadmey of Science, 2009. Web. 26 Mar. 2015.
"Hermann J Muller." GNN - Genetics and Genomics Timeline. Genetics News Network, n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2015.
"Hermann Joseph Muller". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2015. Web. 26 Mar. 2015
"Hermann Muller." Hermann Muller. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2015.
"Hermann Muller." Hermann Muller. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2
"Hermann J. Muller - Biographical". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 26 Mar 2015.

6 comments:

  1. Until this blog post, I honestly had no idea as to who Muller was. This post implies that Muller was a scientist of many talents, his most notable (to me) being his comfort with confrontation and disagreement, which I have found is rare in scientists today. Nevertheless, I feel that your assertion regarding the education of the public about science is completely correct. So many times one will pull up a science article and get discouraged due to the very sophisticated language. To me, Muller’s greatest legacy is being a forerunner of citizen science, something that we should work to promote even more in this day and age.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I had not heard of Hermann Muller before reading this either. I found his willingness to stand up for his beliefs very inspiring. He seemed to truly have confidence in his work and a strong conscience. It seemed like it made life much more difficult for him, as he seemed to be constantly moving, but he seemed too rarely compromise his morals.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you that I think it's incredibly interesting that Muller called for the scientist to educate the public. Normally you don't think of a scientist as a great communicator about the work that they are doing for someone who knows nothing about it. I think that Muller, along with a lot of the other scientists we have learned about this semester, has the quality that makes people very successful. That is confidence in his work and the ability to stand up and speak out for what he believes. You can tell by his many achievements and Nobel Prize that this is a very important quality that I think anyone who is doing research should have.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fascinating article! I love learning about the people behind science; it makes science and medicine feel much more personal. I loved reading about Craig Venter back in the beginning of the semester, and I really enjoyed listening to the symposium presentation about the personalities associated with HD today. I enjoyed how you gave Muller lots of credit, attributing him as a warm, hardworking personality with a lot of confidence!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Although x-rays are definitely important in the medical world even today, it is interesting through this blog post to see how they were found to be so harmful in large doses. I had not previously known about Muller, for I had always seen Marie Curie as the main innovator when it came to x-rays and radiation. As shown in your post, it seems that Muller was not given the proper recognition at first for his research into radiation, for physicians still continued giving patients high doses of radiation and Muller did not receive the Nobel prize until twenty years after his initial experiment with fruit flies. I believe Muller should be a more well-known name today, for his contributions to outlining the dangers of radiation has definitely saved the lives of countless patients through scaling back x-rays.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A very informative, well-written article. Muller was undeniably an important guy, despite some of his views, and acts, being a little questionable to people at the time. In the end, though, it seems he advocated for quite a few new and important differences when compared to the norm of the day, such as releasing research to the public, and informing people to use less radiation. He certainly had an impact leading to the way things are today.

    ReplyDelete