X-rays are a viable part of
medicine today and have been used in clinical medicine and for experimental
purposes in physics since their discovery in 1895. The value of X-rays to
genetics research only became apparent however when Hermann Muller used
radioactivity to produce point mutations in the fruit fly Drosophila. Muller was
an American geneticist known for his demonstration that mutations and hereditary
changes can be caused by X-rays affecting genes and chromosomes. His work on
the mutating abilities of X-rays won him the Nobel Prize for Physiology or
Medicine in 1946.
Hermann Joseph Muller was born
December 21st, 1890 in New York and died April 5, 1967. He grew up
in Manhattan and after graduating high school in 1907 at the age of sixteen,
Muller attended Columbia University and was attracted to the emerging field of
genetics. He was interested specifically in the physical and chemical nature
and operations of genes. Muller also continued his graduate education at
Columbia and spent time in T.H. Morgan’s infamous Drosophila lab. Muller along
with other students in the lab, took part in stealing milk bottles from
apartment steps in order to house the fruit flies.
During his time in the Fly Lab,
Muller published a paper demonstrating the effects of mutations in one gene on
the expression of other genes, implying that many fly characteristics depended
on the interaction of several genes. However, Muller clashed with Morgan and
his other students, particularly Alfred Sturtevant, feeling that he was not
fully acknowledged and that his ideas weren’t fully represented in the papers. Due to his quarrels with members of the lab,
Muller left in 1915 after obtaining his degree.
Muller continued his studies
involving the molecular, physical, and chemical natures and operations of genes
and their resulting effects on gene expression to demonstrate during the 1920s
that X-rays could induce mutations. This discovery won him fame and then later
contributed to his winning of the Nobel Prize.
In 1926 at the University of
Texas, Muller exposed male fruit flies to high doses of radiation to then let
them mate with virgin female fruit flies. Muller was able to artificially
induce more than 100 mutations in the offspring. Some of the mutations were
deadly others were not lethal but visible in the offspring. Muller concluded
that radioactivity had the ability to reach chromosomes to affect the molecular
structure of individual genes leaving them either inoperative or altering their
chemical functions.
Muller’s paper “Artificial
Transmutation of the Gene” published in 1927 provided only an outline of the data
but he presented at the International Congress of Plant Sciences to create a
media sensation. He used his fame from his discovery to caution against the
indiscriminate use of X-rays in medicine. Despite his adamant warnings, some
physicians continued using high amounts of X-rays and some even continued to prescribe
X-rays to stimulate ovulation in sterile women.
Muller also was known for his strong
and often outspoken views on socialism, which got him in trouble with the
administration while working at the University of Texas. He collaborated on a
Communist newspaper at the University resulting in the FBI tracking his
activities. Muller decided to leave for Europe in 1932 during the Depression
and moved to the Soviet Union in 1934.
Initially Muller was happy with
the progressive Communist society in the Soviet Union, however he quickly grew
unhappy as Stalin’s police state attacked genetics by pushing the Lamarckian
ideas of evolution. The state dictated who could work in his lab and
interrogated him for referring to the work of Germans or Russian emigres.
Muller eventually left the Soviet Union in 1937 and spent eight weeks in Spain
helping the International Brigade develop a method of obtaining blood from
recently killed soldiers to use for transfusions. He then moved again, this
time to Scotland and worked at the University of Edinburgh continuing with
X-rays and other mutagens like UV and mustard gas.
In 1940, Muller fled Scotland due
World War II to find a permanent position at Indiana University in 1945. A year
later in 1946, Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on
mutation-inducing X-rays. He seized this opportunity to continue pressing for
more public knowledge about the hazards of X-ray radiation. Hermann Muller
increased his stature to speak out after the dropping of atomic bombs on
Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945.
Throughout his career, Muller
advocated for the education of the public by scientists. He felt that it was
the responsibility of scientists to educate the public on their research or on
pertinent topics. Muller fought against the Texas school board’s attack on
evolution. Hermann Muller often was faced with strict criticism for beliefs,
yet he advocated for scientists to speak out on topics and to not be afraid to
use their voices.
He did promote the view of eugenics, but he
criticized the American eugenics movement for its racism and classism. He
recommended voluntary reproduction through artificial insemination for families
with genetic disorders. He supported “positive” eugenics such as the use of
reproductive technologies such as sperm banks and artificial insemination but
wrote that “ Any attempt to accomplish genetic improvement through dictation
must be debasing and self-defeating”.
Hermann J. Muller died on April 5,
1967 due to congestive heart failure.
I find Muller’s call for
scientists to educate others on their findings to be valuable and vital for the
discoveries of scientists to fully reach their significance and potential. It
isn’t until the knowledge is understood by others, especially the general
public, that we can say that the finding has reached its true value. It allows
people to act on the knowledge for positive change. This can be carried beyond
merely informing the public to involving them as seen in the ideas of Citizen
Science that were discussed a few weeks ago by Dr. Haynes. Involving those influenced
by the issues provides a more direct source to the problems, resulting in ideas
and opinions for solutions from those actually experiencing the problem.
Muller additionally told his students to bear
witness to and to speak out against the abuses of science in their generation. He
argued that genetics was the most subversive science due its basis being
fundamental to human nature and for that we must take the most ethical and respectful
approach. Muller’s continual and adamant advocacy against the dangerous effects
of X-rays is admirable and crucial to our current precautions surroundings use
of radiation. Muller’s insight into genes as individual molecular units was
influential and spurred the development of molecular biology and for that, his
legacy continues today.
Works Cited
Carlson,
Elof. "Hermann Joseph Muller." Hermann Joseph Muller
1890—1967 (2009): n. pag. National Academy of Science Online.
National Acadmey of Science, 2009. Web. 26 Mar. 2015.
"Hermann
J Muller." GNN - Genetics and Genomics Timeline. Genetics News
Network, n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2015.
"Hermann
Joseph Muller". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica
Online.
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2015. Web. 26 Mar. 2015
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2015. Web. 26 Mar. 2015
"Hermann
Muller." Hermann Muller. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, n.d.
Web. 26 Mar. 2015.
"Hermann
Muller." Hermann Muller. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, n.d.
Web. 26 Mar. 2
"Hermann
J. Muller - Biographical". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB
2014. Web. 26 Mar 2015.
Until this blog post, I honestly had no idea as to who Muller was. This post implies that Muller was a scientist of many talents, his most notable (to me) being his comfort with confrontation and disagreement, which I have found is rare in scientists today. Nevertheless, I feel that your assertion regarding the education of the public about science is completely correct. So many times one will pull up a science article and get discouraged due to the very sophisticated language. To me, Muller’s greatest legacy is being a forerunner of citizen science, something that we should work to promote even more in this day and age.
ReplyDeleteI had not heard of Hermann Muller before reading this either. I found his willingness to stand up for his beliefs very inspiring. He seemed to truly have confidence in his work and a strong conscience. It seemed like it made life much more difficult for him, as he seemed to be constantly moving, but he seemed too rarely compromise his morals.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that I think it's incredibly interesting that Muller called for the scientist to educate the public. Normally you don't think of a scientist as a great communicator about the work that they are doing for someone who knows nothing about it. I think that Muller, along with a lot of the other scientists we have learned about this semester, has the quality that makes people very successful. That is confidence in his work and the ability to stand up and speak out for what he believes. You can tell by his many achievements and Nobel Prize that this is a very important quality that I think anyone who is doing research should have.
ReplyDeleteFascinating article! I love learning about the people behind science; it makes science and medicine feel much more personal. I loved reading about Craig Venter back in the beginning of the semester, and I really enjoyed listening to the symposium presentation about the personalities associated with HD today. I enjoyed how you gave Muller lots of credit, attributing him as a warm, hardworking personality with a lot of confidence!
ReplyDeleteAlthough x-rays are definitely important in the medical world even today, it is interesting through this blog post to see how they were found to be so harmful in large doses. I had not previously known about Muller, for I had always seen Marie Curie as the main innovator when it came to x-rays and radiation. As shown in your post, it seems that Muller was not given the proper recognition at first for his research into radiation, for physicians still continued giving patients high doses of radiation and Muller did not receive the Nobel prize until twenty years after his initial experiment with fruit flies. I believe Muller should be a more well-known name today, for his contributions to outlining the dangers of radiation has definitely saved the lives of countless patients through scaling back x-rays.
ReplyDeleteA very informative, well-written article. Muller was undeniably an important guy, despite some of his views, and acts, being a little questionable to people at the time. In the end, though, it seems he advocated for quite a few new and important differences when compared to the norm of the day, such as releasing research to the public, and informing people to use less radiation. He certainly had an impact leading to the way things are today.
ReplyDelete